nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2010 03 v.31 170-173
从卡拉季奇案看被告人的自我辩护权

Summary

Note: Please note that the following content is generated by AI. CNKI does not take any responsibility related to this content.
基金项目(Foundation):
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.15981/j.cnki.dongyueluncong.2010.03.021
6 432 2
阅读 下载 被引

工具集

引用本文 下载本文
PDF
引用导出 分享

    扫码分享到微信或朋友圈

使用微信“扫一扫”功能。
将此内容分享给您的微信好友或者朋友圈
摘要:

卡拉季奇被捕后,对他的审判被广为关注。卡拉季奇案目前暂时中止,以待法庭为其指定的律师熟悉案件之后再重新开庭。被告人在刑事程序中有权选择自我辩护而不要律师代为辩护,但这一权利在国际刑事法庭的实践中带来了不小的问题。本文考察了这些问题,并对目前前南国际刑事法庭在这一问题上的实践进行分析,试图提出合适的解决方式。

Abstract:

KeyWords:
参考文献

[1][2]Prosecutor v.Karadzic,Case No.IT-95-5/18,Case Information Sheet,p.5,参见http://www.icty.org/x/cases/karadz-ic/cis/en/cis-karadzic-en.pdf,2010年1月14日最后一次访问。

1《前南国际刑事法庭规约》,第21条第4款。

[3]Prosecutor v.Milosevic,Transcript,Case No.IT-02-54,Trial Chamber,30August2001,p.18.

[1]Prosecutor v.Barayagwiza,Decision on Defence Counsel Motion to Withdraw,Case No.ICTR-97-19-T,Trial Chamber,2November2000,para.24.

[2]Michael P.Scharf,Self-representation versus Assignment ofDefence Counsel before International Criminal Tribunals,4J.Int'lCrim.Just.31,pp.32-33.

[3]Prosecutor v.Seselj,Order Concerning Appointment ofStandby Counsel and Delayed Commencement ofTrial,Case No.IT-03-67-PT,Trial Chamber,25October2006.

[4][5]Prosecutor v.Seselj,Decision on Appeal Against the Trial Chamber's Decision(No.2)on Assignment ofCounsel,Case No.IT-03-67-AR73.4,Appeals Chamber,8December2006,para.30.

[6]Prosecutor v.Karadzic,Decision on the Accused's Motion to Vacate Appointment ofRichard Harvey,Case No.IT-95-5/18-T,Trial Chamber,23December2009.

[1]Prosecutor v.Milosevic,Reasons for Decision on the Prosecution Motion Concerning Assignment ofCounsel,Case No.IT-02-54,Trial Chamber,4April2003,para.40.

[2]Prosecutor v.Seselj,Public Version ofthe"Consolidated Decision on Assignment ofCounsel,Adjournment and Prosecution Motionfor Additional Time with Separate Opinion ofPresiding Judge Antonetti in Annex",Case No.IT-03-67-T,Trial Chamber,24No-vember2009,paras.52-57.

[3][4][5]Prosecutor v.Seselj,Public Version ofthe"Consolidated Decision on Assignment ofCounsel,Adjournment and Prosecution Mo-tion for Additional Time with Separate Opinion ofPresiding Judge Antonetti in Annex",Case No.IT-03-67-T,Trial Chamber,24November2009,paras.39-42.

[6]Prosecutor v.Seselj,Decision on Appeal Against the Trial Chamber's Decision on Assignment ofCounsel,Case No.IT-03-67-AR73.3,Appeals Chamber,20October2006,para.32.

1参见联合国安理会第827号决议(1993年)。

[1]Prosecutor v.Seselj,Public Version ofthe"Consolidated Decision on Assignment ofCounsel,Adjournment and Prosecution Motionfor Additional Time with Separate Opinion ofPresiding Judge Antonetti in Annex",Case No.IT-03-67-T,Trial Chamber,24No-vember2009,paras.80-81,87.

1《公民权利和政治权利国际公约》,第14条;《前南国际刑事法庭规约》,第21条,第4款。

2前南国际刑事法庭《程序和证据规则》,第45条。

3《前南国际刑事法庭规约》,第20条第1款。

[2]Prosecutor v.Seselj,Public Version ofthe"Consolidated Decision on Assignment ofCounsel,Adjournment and Prosecution Motionfor Additional Time with Separate Opinion ofPresiding Judge Antonetti in Annex",Case No.IT-03-67-T,Trial Chamber,24No-vember2009,p.35.

[3]Coran Sluiter,"Fairness and the Interests ofJustice":Illusive Concepts in the Milosevic Case,3J.Int'l Crim.Just.9.

[4]Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies,UN.Doc.HRI/GEN/1/Rev.7,12May2004,p.135,General Comment No.13Adopted by the Human Rights Committee,para.1.

基本信息:

DOI:10.15981/j.cnki.dongyueluncong.2010.03.021

中图分类号:D99

引用信息:

[1]张膑心.从卡拉季奇案看被告人的自我辩护权[J].东岳论丛,2010,31(03):170-173.DOI:10.15981/j.cnki.dongyueluncong.2010.03.021.

基金信息:

文档文件

引用

GB/T 7714-2015 格式引文
MLA格式引文
APA格式引文