东岳论丛

参考文献

1 David Knowles,The Evolution of Medieval Thought,New York:Random House,1962,p.140.

2 Quentin Taylor,“John of Salisbury,the Policraticus,and Political Thought”,Humanitas,vol.19,Issue 1/2(2006),p.133.

3 Charles Howard McI lwain,The Growth of Political Thought in the West:from the Greeks to the end of the Middle Ages,New York:Macmillan,1932,p.324.

4 Entheticus音译为《恩特替卡斯》,是约翰自创的希腊词汇,但他并不懂希腊语,而是借此传播经典。该著包括两部挽歌诗作,其中一部是介绍《论政府原理》的。该拉丁著作经典的英文翻译和编辑版本为拉霍温(Jan van Laarhoven)的三卷本:Entheticus Maior and Minor,Edited and Translated by Jan van Laarhoven,3vols,Leiden,Netherlands;New York:E.J.Brill,1987.内德曼认为约翰很可能在四十年代的巴黎学生生涯时期写作了这部诗集的主要部分,剩下的部分似乎在1156年底前完成,参见Cary J.Nederman,John of Salisbury,Tempe and Arizona:Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies,2005,p.43.

567 Entheticus Maior and Minor,Edited and Translated by Jan van Laarhoven,vol.1,Leiden,Netherlands;New York:E.J.Brill,1987,pp.188-191,pp.190-191,pp.192-193.

1 3 Entheticus Maior and Minor,Edited and Translated by Jan van Laarhoven,vol.1,Leiden,Netherlands;New York:E.J.Brill,1987,pp.194-201,pp.194-195.

2 David Luscome,“John of Salisbury in Recent Scholarship”,in The World of John of Salisbury,Blackwell publishers,edited by Michael Wilks,Oxford:Basil Blackwell,1984,p.29.此外拉霍温(Jan van Laarhoven)、汉斯·利贝许茨(Hans Liebeschütz)和内德曼(Cary J.Nederman)都有相同的观点,具体见:Entheticus Maior and Minor,Edited and Translated by Jan van Laarhoven,vol.1,Leiden,Netherlands;New York:E.J.Brill,1987,p.55.Hans Liebeschütz,Mediaeval Humanism in the Life and Writings of John of Salisbury,Nendeln:Kraus Reprint,1968,pp.20-22;Cary J.Nederman,“The Changing Face of Tyranny:The Reign of King Stephen in John of Salisbury’s Political Thought”,Nottingham Medieval Studies,33(1989),p.3.

4 Policraticus:of the Frivolities of Courtiers and the Footprints of Philosophers,中译常用《论政府原理》,全称《论政府原理:朝臣的轻薄与哲学家的足迹》,全书约完成于1159年,该著内容涵盖了政治学、道德理论、思辨哲学、神学、法学、军事学和文学等诸多领域。Policraticus也是约翰自创的类似于希腊语的词,又可译为《政治家书》。该著拉丁版本参见C.C.J.Webb,Episcopi Carnotensis Policratici sive de nugis curialium et vestigiis philosophorvm libri viii,Oxonii:Typographeo Clarendoniano;Londini;Novi Eboraci,1909.该著尚无完整的英文译著,更无中文译著。有关政治部分(political)的英文译著参见:The Statesman’s Book of John of Salisbury–Being the Fourth,Fifth,and Sixth Books and Selections from the Seventh and Eighth Books,of the Policraticus,Translated into English with an Introduction by John Dickinson,New York:Russell﹠Russell,1963.有关宫廷奉承部分(courtly)参见:Frivolities of Courtiers and the Footprints of Philosophers:Being the First,Second,and Third Books and Selections from the Seventh and Eighth Books of the Policraticus of John of Salisbury,Edited and Translated by Joseph B.Pike,New York:The University of Minnesota,1972.近年来流行的译著见:Policraticus:of theF rivolities of Courtiers and the Footprints of Philosophers,Edited and Translated by Cary J.Nederman,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1990,遗憾的是该版本仅有John Dickinson译著的一小部分,几页涉及Joseph B.Pike的译著。中国政法大学出版社已引进Cary J.Nederman的版本:Beijing:China University of Political Science and Law Publishing Company,2003.

5 Frivolities of Courtiers and the Footprints of Philosophers:Being the First,Second,and Third Books and Selections from the Seventh and Eighth Books of the Policraticus of John of Salisbury,Edited and Translated by Joseph B.Pike,New York:The University of Minnesota,1972,Book III,Chap.15,p.211.

6 78The Statesman’s book of John of Salisbury–Being the Fourth,Fifth,and Sixth Books and Selections from the Seventh and Eighth Books,of the Policraticus,Translated into English with an Introduction by John Dickinson,New York:Russell﹠Russell,1963,p.1,p.335.p.394.

9 Webb在Policraticus后列举了约翰的引用,包括大量引用了《民法大全》(又称《查士丁尼法典》,Corpus Juris Civilis)和《格拉提安教令集》(Decretum)。

1 4578910瑏瑡瑏瑢瑏瑣The Statesman’s book of John of Salisbury–Being the Fourth,Fifth,and Sixth Books and Selections from the Seventh and Eighth Books,of the Policraticus,Translated into English with an Introduction by John Dickinson,New York:Russell﹠Russell,1963,p.335,pp.350-351,p.352,pp.399-400,p.356,p.349,pp.356-357,p.349,p.364,pp.358-391.

2 约翰对神法的看法与13世纪的托马斯·阿奎那(Thomas Aquinas,约1225-1274)类似,阿奎那将法律分为永恒法(神的自然法)、自然法(人的自然法)、人法(人的成文法)和神法(神的成文法,主要是《圣经》)四种类型。

3 Kate Langdon Forhan,“Salisbury’s Stakes:The Uses of‘Tyranny’in John of Salisbury’s Policraticus”,History of Political Thought,Imprint Academic,Volume XI,Issue 3 Autumn(1990),p.403.

6 Hector J.Massey,“John of Salisbury:Some Aspects of His Political Philosophy”,Classica et mediaevalia:revue danoise de philologie et d’histoire XXVIII,Copenhagen:Museum Tusculanum Press,1967,p.367.

1 Webb(John of Salisbury,London:Methuen&Co.Ltd.,1932,p.68)怀疑约翰并没有写过此书,或者没有留存下来。

2 拉丁文moderatione,英文moderate,丛日云将其译为“中庸”并做了分析,见徐大同主编,丛日云分卷主编:《西方政治思想史》(第二卷),天津:天津人民出版社2005年版,第263-265页。

3 Cary J.Nederman,“The Aristotelian Doctrine of the Mean and John of Salisbury’s Concept of Liberty”,Vivarium,Vol.2 ,No.2,1986,pp.128-142.

4 Frivolities of Courtiers and the Footprints of Philosophers:Being the First,Second,and Third Books and Selections from the Seventh and Eighth Books of the Policraticus of John of Salisbury,Edited and Translated by Joseph B.Pike,New York:The University of Minnesota,1972,Book I,Chap.4,p.25.

5 78910 The Statesman’s book of John of Salisbury–Being the Fourth,Fifth,and Sixth Books and Selections from the Seventh and Eighth Books,of the Policraticus,Translated into English with an Introduction by John Dickinson,New York:Russell﹠Russell,1963,pp.372-373,p.85.p.356,p.25,p.259,p.375,pp.368-369.

6 Richard H.Rouse and Mary A.Rouse,“John of Salisbury and the Doctrine of Tyrannicide”,Speculum,Vol.42,No.4(1967),p.698.

James H.Eberenz,The Concept of Sovereignty in Four Medieval Political Philosophers:John of Salisbury,St.Thomas Aquinas,Egidius Colonna and Marsilius of Padua,Ph.D Dissertation,The Catholic University of America,1968,pp.90-92.

Cary J.Nederman,“A duty to Kill:John of Salisbury’s Theory of Tyrannicide”,The Review of Politics,Vol.50,No.3(1988),pp.365-389;“The Changing Face of Tyranny:The Reign of King Stephen in John of Salisbury’s Political Thought”,Nottingham Medieval Studies,33(1989),pp.1-20;”Priests,Kings,and Tyrants:Spiritual and Temporal Power in John of Salisbury's Policraticus”,Speculum 66,No.3(1991),pp.572-590.

1 Jan Van Laarhoven,“Thou Shalt Not Slay a Tyrant!The So-Called Theory of John of Salisbury”,The World of John of Salisbury,Edited by Michael Wilks,Oxford:Basil Blackwell,1984,p.328.

2 孟广林:《试论中古英国神学家约翰的“王权神授”学说》,载《世界历史》,1997年第6期,第74-82页。

3 Hans Liebeschütz,“John of Salisbury and Pseudo-Plutarch”,Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes,Vol.6(1943),p.34.

4 Hans Liebeschütz,Mediaeval Humanism in the Life and Writings of John of Salisbury,London:Warburg Institute,1950,p.17.

5 C.C.J.Webb,John of Salisbury,London:Methuen&Co.Ltd.,1932,pp.22-24.

6 8910The Letters of John of Salisbury,The Early letters(1153-1161),vol.1,Edited by W.J.Millor,S.J.and H.E.Butler;revised by C.N.L.Brooke,Oxford:Clarendon Press;New York:Oxford University Press,2003,p.182,p.35,footnote 2,p.xxxviii,p220.

7 Ibid,pp.xii-xxiv.约翰有可能最早从1148年或最晚从1154年开始任秘书一职。

1 2 Amon Linder,“The Knowledge of John of Salisbury in the Late Middle Ages”,Studi medievali,Spoleto:Centro Italiano di Studi Sull’alto Medioevo di Spoleto,serie 3,18 FASC.2 1977,p.321,p.324.

3 参见英文译著:Concerning the Instruction of Princes,translated from the original Latin by Joseph Stevenson,Felinfach:J.M.F.Books,1991.该译著仅包括第二和第三部分,论述君主和暴君的第一部分尚无英文译著。

4 Cary J.Nederman,“The Liberty of the Church and the Road to Runnymede:John of Salisbury and the Intellectual Foundations of the Magna Carta”,Political Science and Politics.Vol.43,Issue 3(2010),pp.456-461.

5 Fritz Schulz,“Bracton on Kingship”,The English Historical Review,Vol.60,No.237(1945),p.153.

6 78 Walter Ullmann,“The Influence of John of Salisbury on Medieval Italian Jurists”,The English Historical Review,Vol.59,No.235(1944),p.391,p.387,p.391.

9 Charles Howard McI lwain,The Growth of Political Thought in the West:From the Greeks to the End of the Middle Ages,New York:Macmillan,1932,p.323.

R.W.Carlyle and A.J.Carlyle,A History of Mediaeval Political Theory in the West,Vol.III,Political Theory from the Tenth Century to the Thirteenth,Edinburgh and London:William Blackwood and sons,1915,pp.181-185.